UtahRails.net Copyright 2000-2008 Don Strack

Utah & Northern Railway (1878-1889)

This page was last updated on December 16, 2007.

Utah & Northern Railway was organized in April 1878 by Union Pacific interests to own and operate the bankrupt Utah Northern Railroad. The route was three-feet narrow gauge from Ogden, Utah, north to Garrison, Mont., a total of 466 miles. From Pocatello north into Montana, the route was changed to standard gauge on July 24, 1887. The narrow gauge line north from Ogden to McGammon, Idaho, was replaced in 1890 by a newly constructed standard gauge line.

In 1889, Utah & Northern became part of Oregon Short Line & Utah Northern, which was organized in August 1889 as a consolidation of the original 1881 Oregon Short Line Railway and six other UP-controlled railroads operating in Utah and Idaho.

Additonal Sources:

Locomotive Roster

Much of the following two rosters is based largely on George Pitchard's research, along with other earlier sources including Allen Copeland's early Utah & Northern roster from December 1964.

Later research and published works were compared with earlier works and published efforts, with later works usually given greater weight.

Utah & Northern Railway, 1878 to 1885 renumbering

U&N
Number
Type Previous
Number
Builder Builder
Number
Builder
Date
Date
To U&N
1885
Number
Notes
U&N 1 2-4-0 UN 1, "John W. Young" Grant   Oct 1871     1
U&N 1 (2nd) 2-6-0 Summit County 2 Baldwin 3663 Nov 1874 Sep 1880 U&N 290  
U&N 2 2-6-0 UN 2, "Utah" Grant   Sep 1872     1
U&N 3 2-6-0 UN 3, "Idaho" Grant   Sep 1872   U&N 297  
U&N 4 4-6-0 UN 4, "Logan" Grant   Apr 1874   U&N 285  
U&N 5 4-6-0 UN 5, "Franklin" Grant   Jun 1874   U&N 286  
U&N 6 2-6-0   Baldwin 4425   Sep 1878   U&N 10  
U&N 7 2-6-0   Baldwin 4429 Sep 1878   U&N 11  
U&N 8 2-6-0   Baldwin 4430 Sep 1878   U&N 12  
U&N 9 2-6-0   Baldwin 4555 Mar 1879   U&N 13  
U&N 10 2-6-0   Baldwin 4558 Mar 1879   U&N 14  
U&N 11 2-6-0   Baldwin 4559 Mar 1879   U&N 15  
U&N 12 2-6-0   Baldwin 4561 Mar 1879   U&N 16  
U&N 13 2-6-0   Baldwin 4562 Mar 1879   U&N 17  
U&N 14 2-6-0   Baldwin 4563 Mar 1879   U&N 18  
U&N 15 2-6-0   Baldwin 4564 Mar 1879   U&N 19  
U&N 16 2-6-0   Baldwin 4964 Feb 1880   U&N 20  
U&N 17 2-6-0   Baldwin 4966 Feb 1880   U&N 21  
U&N 18 2-6-0   Baldwin 4967 Feb 1880   U&N 22  
U&N 19 2-6-0   Baldwin 5121 May 1880   U&N 23  
U&N 20 2-6-0   Baldwin 5122 May 1880   U&N 24  
U&N 21 2-6-0   Baldwin 5129 Jun 1880   U&N 25  
U&N 22 2-6-0 Summit County 1 Baldwin 3113 Jan 1873 Sep 1880 U&N 2  
U&N 23 2-6-0   Brooks 494 Jan 1881   U&N 80  
U&N 24 2-6-0   Brooks 495 Jan 1881   U&N 81  
U&N 25 2-6-0   Brooks 504 Feb 1881   U&N 82  
U&N 26 2-6-0   Brooks 505 Feb 1881   U&N 83  
U&N 27 2-6-0   Brooks 514 Mar 1881   U&N 84

U&N 28 2-6-0   Brooks 515 Mar 1881   U&N 85  
U&N 29 2-6-0   Brooks 520 Apr 1881   U&N 86

U&N 30 2-6-0   Brooks 529 Apr 1881   U&N 87  
U&N 31 2-6-0   Brooks 530 Apr 1881   U&N 88

U&N 32 2-6-0   Brooks 536 May 1881   U&N 89  
U&N 33 2-6-0   Brooks 554 Jul 1881   U&N 90  
U&N 34 2-6-0   Brooks 559 Jul 1881   U&N 91  
U&N 35 2-6-0   Brooks 562 Jul 1881   U&N 92  
U&N 36 2-6-0   Brooks 566 Aug 1881   U&N 93  
U&N 37 2-6-0   Brooks 567 Aug 1881   U&N 94  
U&N 38 2-6-0   Brooks 579 Sep 1881   U&N 95  
U&N 39 2-6-0   Brooks 587 Sep 1881   U&N 96

U&N 40 2-6-0   Brooks 597 Oct 1881   U&N 97

U&N 41 2-6-0   Brooks 605 Nov 1881   U&N 98  
U&N 42 2-6-0   Brooks 626 Dec 1881   U&N 99

U&N 43 2-6-0   Brooks 627 Dec 1881   U&N 100  
U&N 44 2-6-0   Brooks 826 Dec 1882   U&N 101  
U&N 45 0-4-4T (see note) Mason 461 Jul 1872   U&N 296  

General Notes:

a. Builder Date, shown above, is derived from either "Date of Trial" or "Date Shipped" dates (whichever is earliest) in builder records.
b. Tenders on the Grant locomotives were of two types - those on engines 1, 2 and 3 were of a six-wheel type, with one fixed wheelset at the front (having inside bearings), and one ordinary four-wheel truck at the rear, while the tenders on Nos. 4 and 5 were of the usual two-truck style. In the June 1, 1885 roster, the tender of the old No. 3 is shown as holding 584 gallons water and 2 tons coal; those of old No. 4 and No. 5 are shown as holding 900 gallons water and 2-1/2 tons of coal. The low capacity of No. 3's tender would seem to indicate it still had its original tender - at least above the frame.
c. As history for U&N 22 and 1 (ex Summit County 1 and 2), George Pitchard wrote the following:
In September, 1880, the two Summit County engines appear on the Utah & Northern account, both of them appearing as an 'equipment expenditure' for the U&N, at a cost of $5,000 for the both of them.

U&N 1 (2nd) as Summit County No. 2, was built Baldwin class number 8/18D-11, had 12 x 16" cylinders, 36-inch drivers, and engine weight of 38100 pounds, and became U & N 2nd No. 1 before being renumbered in 1885 to No. 290.

Summit County Railroad No. 2 was turned over to the Utah & Northern on March 26, 1878, while the U&N was, in fact, still the Utah Northern Railroad. Eventually Summit County No. 2 became Utah & Northern 2nd No. 1, but the exact date is unknown, since U&N's first No. 1, the Grant 2-4-0, is on the property through September of 1881. It is known that Summit County No. 2 operated on the Utah & Northern for some time as SCRR No. 2, and was not officially transferred, apparently, to the U&N until September of 1880. It may be the case that the U&N's original No. 1, being after all a very light 2-4-0 with huge drivers, was out of service and 'retired' for some time prior to its actual sale in September of 1881, perhaps early enough to allow the renumbering of SCRR No. 2 to U&N 2nd No. 1 by September of 1880.

A precedent exists, on a UP-controlled narrow gauge line, for the denumbering of an old, light engine to make way for better power. On the Colorado Central Railroad, where the ancient and underpowered 0-4-0 engines lost their numbers in 1874 and 1875, two of them remaining on the line as late as 1879, identified only by names applied when un-numbered. It's easy to see a similar occurrence on the Utah & Northern in 1880.

U&N 22 as Summit County No. 1, was built Baldwin class number 12D-16, had 11 x 16" cylinders, 36" drivers, and engine weight of 35,000 pounds, and became U & N No. 22, in 1885 renumbered to No. 2, one of four engines in class DF-1.

Both engines were dropped from equipment prior to January 1, 1891, and scrapped.
Allen Copeland's U&N roster shows specifications for Summit County 1 and 2 as 12x18 inch cylinders, 36 inch drivers, 38,100 pounds engine weight, 6,557 pounds tractive effort.
d. U&N 6 through 21 were all 2-6-0 "Mogul" type, built by the Baldwin Locomotive Works, Philadelphia, Penna., having 12 x 18" cylinders, 40" drivers, and an engine weight of 39,000 pounds, as built, with tenders of the usual two-truck style, holding 1,200 gallons water and three (3) tons coal. Note that the system roster of. June 1st, 1885, shows this class with 42" drivers. These engines were of Baldwin class 8/18D, numbers 29-31, 35-41, and 46-51, in that order.
e. U&N 23 through 44 were also 2-6-0 "Mogul" engines, built by the Brooks Locomotive Works, Dunkirk, New York, having 14x18 inch cylinders and 41 inch drivers as built. The system roster of June 1, 1885 shows this class as having 42 inch drivers, and an engine weight of 45,800 pounds, with tenders (of the usual two-truck style) holding 1,358 gallons of water and three (3) tons of coal.

In late 1880, Union Pacific ordered several 2-6-0 Mogul engines from Brooks, for the Utah & Northern. Deliveries began in January 1881 and continued through January 1883; a total of 22 Brooks 2-6-0 engines were received. U&N 23 through 41 were delivered in 1881; U&N 42 and 43 were delivered in April 1882, and the last locomotive, U&N 44, was delivered in January 1883. They all had the following general specifications:

Cylinder, 14x18 inches; Driver, 42 inches; Weight on Drivers, 39700 pounds; Engine Weight, 45800 pounds.

U&N 44 was ordered, built and delivered as Kansas Central No. 12, diverted upon receipt by parent Union Pacific to Utah & Northern No. 44; renumbered to U&N 101 in 1885.

Note that there was no number 45 on the U&N as a Brooks mogul.
f. U&N 45 was a very unique locomotive. Its lineage has it being built for American Fork Railroad; sold to Eureka & Palisade Railroad in Nevada; sold to Nevada Central Railway; then to Utah & Northern Railway. As history, George Pitchard wrote the following:
U&N 45 on the Utah & Northern was an odd engine indeed, it being the old 0-4-4T Mason 'bogie' engine built in 1871, on speculation, and sold in April of 1872 to the American Fork Railroad as their (first) No. 1, and named "American Fork" on that road. In service, it soon proved too light, and was offered for sale in April 1873; the last mention of it that I have found, where I am sure that it is on the American Fork RR property, is in September of 1873. From that date, until it appears on the Utah & Northern Railway in 1883, its whereabouts, for an entire decade, is unknown.

Specifications: 11x15-inch cylinders; 34 inch drivers; 29,900 pounds; dropped from equipment in 1886. Although only 15 years old in 1886, when it was dropped from the equipment, it is presumed that the engine was scrapped at the same time.

Utah & Northern Ry. No. 45 began life as a sort of demonstrator, the first locomotive built by Mason on the single-boiler Fairlie design now so well-known as the "Mason Bogie" locomotive, built in late 1871 to early 1872 with no specific purchaser in mind, simply to demonstrate the principles involved. In April of 1872, it was sold (with an order for a twin) to the American Fork Railroad, to which it was shipped on July 1, 1872, being assigned shop number 461 at that time. It was numbered AFRR No. 1, and named "American Fork" as well. This locomotive being rather light, it was not exactly a stunning success on a railroad having grades of 296 feet per mile (nearly 6 percent), and was offered for sale before the commencement of the second season of operations on the American Fork RR. There were no immediate takers, and the locomotive was not sold until late in 1873, probably December, to the organizers of the Eureka & Palisade RR, in Nevada. After passing through the Central Pacific's shops at Carlin for what appears to have been a refurbishing and repainting, this engine appears on the Eureka & Palisade RR in early 1874 as that road's No. 1, named "Eureka." In 1875, upon the arrival of a new Baldwin 4-4-0 named 'Eureka' (which still exists), the Mason appears to have been renamed "Onward," possibly as a result of someone having seen one or another of the large number of pictures of a 'similar' engine so named, or perhaps as a result of having discovered that name under several layers of paint on the engine.

E. & P. No. 1, by whatever name, was sold in October 1879 to the then-being-built Nevada Central Ry., as its No. 2, named "Austin," which in mid-1881 is renumbered to 2nd No. 3, on account of the arrival of a new Mogul No. 2 from Baldwin; while it may have retained its name "Austin" as the new No. 3, it seems most frequently to be referred to as the "Dinkey" in this period. In December 1882, the "Dinkey" (No. 3) is transferred to the Utah & Northern, to be used 'temporarily' on that road, likely as a switcher; the freight charge of $132.93 is charged to the Utah & Northern's equipment account in December 1882, and the temporary transfer ends up as a permanent thing, and the engine is assigned No. 45 on the U&N. Renumbered in 1885 to number 296, it was vacated in May 1886, and scrapped.

Nevada Central Ry. 2nd No. 3 transferred to Utah & Northern Ry. in December 1882, to be used 'temporarily' (according to the journal entry), but which was retained, and assigned U & N No. 45. The engine was an 0-4-4T "Bogie" built by the Mason Machine Works, Taunton, Mass., construction number 461, 1 Jul 1872, having 10x15" cylinders, 33" drivers, and an engine weight of 14 tons. In 1885, this engine was renumbered to U&N No. 296, with the system roster of June 1, 1885 showing the engine as having 11x15" cylinders, 34" drivers, and engine weight of 29,900 pounds As No. 296, this engine was declared vacant in May 1886, and scrapped.

As late as 2004, George Pitchard's research showed that U&N 45 was NEVER rebuilt from its original 0-4-4T "Bogie" configuration into anything else, never mind some sort of bizarre 0-4-2T, as is alleged in at least one source that he was aware of.

In the 1989 reprint of UP's June 1, 1885 listing of "Locomotives, Snow Plows, Flangers and Passenger and Freight Car Equipment" used by most researchers of the 1885 renumbering, U&N 296 is shown as a member of the "Odd" class, in the number series of 290-299, while the South Park 2-6-6-T locomotives of the similar Mason "Bogie" design were classed as Class D Mogul, and the South Park 2-8-6T Mason locomotives were classed as Class E Consolidation, the rear (or tank) truck not being considered in determining classification.

Notes:

1 U&N 1, ex UN 1 "John W. Young", and U&N 2, ex UN 2, "Utah", were both sold in September 1881 to Barrows & Co., a dealer working out of New York City; freight was paid by U&N either to Council Bluffs in October 1881, or to Kansas City in November, for unknown later owner. (September 1881 sale date to Barrows & Co., for $10,000 for both locomotives, and subsequent freight for one locomotive to Council Bluffs in October 1881, and the other to Kansas City in November 1881, from U&N account books for September, October, and November 1881, now part of the U. P. collection at the Nebraska State Historical Society, Lincoln.)

"Two of the oldest narrow gauge Utah and Northern engines were yesterday loaded upon Union Pacific flat cars for shipment east, but were held to await further orders. One of the engines was in the Logan round-house fire and both have been refitted and made quite new in appearance. It is thought that the company has sold them to make place for more powerful engines." (Salt Lake Herald, October 20, 1881, page 8, "Chips" column, lifted from the Ogden Pilot)

Utah & Northern Railway, 1885 renumbering to 1889 consolidation as OSL&UN

1885 U&N
Number
Previous
U&N Number
Type Previous
Number
Builder Builder
Number
Builder
Date
Notes
U&N 2 U&N 22 2-6-0 Summit County 1 Baldwin 3113 Jan 1873 1
U&N 10 U&N 6 2-6-0   Baldwin 4425   Sep 1878 1
U&N 11 U&N 7 2-6-0   Baldwin 4429 Sep 1878 2
U&N 12 U&N 8 2-6-0   Baldwin 4430 Sep 1878 1
U&N 13 U&N 9 2-6-0   Baldwin 4555 Mar 1879 3
U&N 14 U&N 10 2-6-0   Baldwin 4558 Mar 1879 1
U&N 15 U&N 11 2-6-0   Baldwin 4559 Mar 1879 1
U&N 16 U&N 12 2-6-0   Baldwin 4561 Mar 1879 4
U&N 17 U&N 13 2-6-0   Baldwin 4562 Mar 1879 5
U&N 18 U&N 14 2-6-0   Baldwin 4563 Mar 1879 6
U&N 19 U&N 15 2-6-0   Baldwin 4564 Mar 1879 7
U&N 20 U&N 16 2-6-0   Baldwin 4964 Feb 1880 1
U&N 21 U&N 17 2-6-0   Baldwin 4966 Feb 1880 1
U&N 22 U&N 18 2-6-0   Baldwin 4967 Feb 1880 8
U&N 23 U&N 19 2-6-0   Baldwin 5121 May 1880 9
U&N 24 U&N 20 2-6-0   Baldwin 5122 May 1880 10
U&N 25 U&N 21 2-6-0   Baldwin 5129 Jun 1880 10
U&N 80 U&N 23 2-6-0   Brooks 494 Jan 1881 11
U&N 81 U&N 24 2-6-0   Brooks 495 Jan 1881 1
U&N 82 U&N 25 2-6-0   Brooks 504 Feb 1881 1
U&N 83 U&N 26 2-6-0   Brooks 505 Feb 1881 12
U&N 84 U&N 27 2-6-0   Brooks 514 Mar 1881 13
U&N 85 U&N 28 2-6-0   Brooks 515 Mar 1881 1
U&N 86 U&N 29 2-6-0   Brooks 520 Apr 1881 14
U&N 87 U&N 30 2-6-0   Brooks 529 Apr 1881 1
U&N 88 U&N 31 2-6-0   Brooks 530 Apr 1881 13
U&N 89 U&N 32 2-6-0   Brooks 536 May 1881 1
U&N 90 U&N 33 2-6-0   Brooks 554 Jul 1881 1
U&N 91 U&N 34 2-6-0   Brooks 559 Jul 1881 15
U&N 92 U&N 35 2-6-0   Brooks 562 Jul 1881 1
U&N 93 U&N 36 2-6-0   Brooks 566 Aug 1881 1
U&N 94 U&N 37 2-6-0   Brooks 567 Aug 1881 11
U&N 95 U&N 38 2-6-0   Brooks 579 Sep 1881 1
U&N 96 U&N 39 2-6-0   Brooks 587 Sep 1881 13
U&N 97 U&N 40 2-6-0   Brooks 597 Oct 1881 14
U&N 98 U&N 41 2-6-0   Brooks 605 Nov 1881 1
U&N 99 U&N 42 2-6-0   Brooks 626 Dec 1881 13
U&N 100 U&N 43 2-6-0   Brooks 627 Dec 1881 1
U&N 101 U&N 44 2-6-0   Brooks 826 Dec 1882 16
U&N 260   2-8-0   Rhode Island 1592 1886 17
U&N 261   2-8-0   Rhode Island 1593 1886 17
U&N 262   2-8-0   Rhode Island 1594 1886 17
U&N 263   2-8-0   Rhode Island 1595 1886 17
U&N 264   2-8-0   Rhode Island 1596 1886 17
U&N 265   2-8-0   Rhode Island 1597 1886 17
U&N 285 U&N 4 4-6-0 UN 4, "Logan" Grant   Apr 1874 18
U&N 286 U&N 5 4-6-0 UN 5, "Franklin" Grant   Jun 1874 18
U&N 290 U&N 1 (2nd) 2-6-0 Summit County 2 Baldwin 3663 Nov 1874 1
U&N 296 U&N 45 0-4-4T (see note) Mason 461 Jul 1872  
U&N 297 U&N 3 2-6-0 UN 3, "Idaho" Grant   Sep 1872 19

General Notes:

a. U&N 101 was ordered, built and delivered as Kansas Central No. 12, diverted upon receipt by parent Union Pacific to Utah & Northern No. 44; renumbered to U&N 101 in 1885.
b. U&N 260-265 were the last new narrow gauge engines acquired by the Utah & Northern, as a group of six large 2-8-0 "Consolidated" engines, built in early 1886 by the Rhode Island Locomotive Works, Providence, R.I., shop numbers 1592-1597, two each in February, March and April, 1886, with the following general specifications:

16x18 inch cylinders, 37 inch drivers, engine weight of 70,118 pounds, weight on drivers of 60,200 pounds, tractive effort of 16,620 pounds, with tenders holding 1,750 gallons water and 4-1/2 tons coal.

The May 1886 journal entry for the purchase of these locomotives (Nos. 260-265) is, at first glance, rather odd, since it is for only one locomotive - for which the likely explanation is that with six new locomotives being added, five old ones (Nos. 101, 285, 286, 296 and 297) were struck off, leaving a net of one new locomotive to be entered in the accounts. If the paperwork behind the May 1886 journal entry were ever to come to light, it would show that six new locomotives added, at $6,850.00 each, less five old locomotives vacated, at $6,850.00 each, leaves one new locomotive, at $6,850.00, to be charged in May of 1886.

These locomotives, by far the largest on the Utah & Northern narrow gauge, were acquired primarily for the Butte-Anaconda ore trains,. but also with the haul over Monida Pass in mind; however, with the widening of the line from Butte to Garrison in July of 1886 (and its transfer to the Montana Union), the primary use of these engines became the Monida Pass work. Then, with the widening of the line north of Pocatello in July of 1887, little use for these engines remained on the bit of line still narrow gauge, and most (if not all) of these engines soon found their way to the South Park line in Colorado, to which road the entire class, all six of them, were transferred officially in July 1890.

Notes:

1. A total of 19 locomotives either sold or scrapped before 1891. The OSL&UN numbers were: 2, 10, 12, 14, 15, 20, 21, 81, 82, 85, 87, 89, 90, 92, 93, 95, 98, 100 and 290. Based on an accounting journal entry dated December 31, 1891, these 19 OSL&UN narrow gauge locomotives were "dropped from equipment prior to January 1, 1891; scrapped." Contrary to previous reports published in "Rails, Sagebrush and Pine," page 103 (and cited in "American Narrow Gauge Railroads," page 112), this entry helps to document that UP did not sell complete former U&N narrow gauge locomotives for anything less that $2000.00.
2. U&N 11 (ex U&N 7) was transferred to Utah & Nevada No. 4, probably in May 1888.

From subsequent events, it is clear that Utah & Northern No. 11 (construction number 4429) was sold (or in some manner transferred) to the Utah & Nevada line at some time prior to June 1, 1889; and from data in the roster of June 1, 1889, and the Annual Reports, it can be determined that Utah & Northern No. 11 left the Utah & Northern sometime in the year prior to May 31, 1888. An item in the Salt Lake Tribune of May 12, 1888 indicates the possibility that this transfer occurred just prior to the date of the item.

Research indicates that the No. 11 became Utah & Nevada No. 4 (see Salt Lake Tribune, March 10, 1889), and in the merged OSL&UN scheme, regained its old number, 11, sometime in or after August 1889. In March 1897, No. 11 is one of three (3) former Utah & Northern narrow-gauge engines carried over from the OSL&UN into the new O.S.L.'s roster, where it becomes No. 2, and remains on the roster through the end of O.S.L. narrow gauge operations in mid-November of 1902.

In April of 1903, OSL number 2 is one of two former Utah & Northern engines (narrow gauge) then on the OSL roster to be sold to the Sumpter Valley Railway, where it initially becomes Sumpter Valley No. 11 (yet again!), renumbered to No. 12 in about 1906, and out of service and retired by June 30, 1916, but not scrapped, as in 1936 or so the engine is donated to the Pocatello campus of Idaho State University, where it is displayed, as No. 11, for about six years. In 1942, at the pointed request of the Union Pacific, it is given over to the war-time scrap drive and cut up, in about November of 1942, the next-to-last surviving Utah & Northern Baldwin Mogul.
3. U&N 13 was sold in November 1887 to Salt Lake & Ft. Douglas 13, later SL&FtD 6; the U&N journal entry shows the sale price as $3,500.

U&N 13 and 16 are known from journal entry (and other documents) to have been sold to the Salt Lake & Ft. Douglas Railroad, where they (eventually) became SLFtD 6 and 3, respectively. Since OSL&UN number 3 was by 1893 in use on a 2-8-0 locomotive, the earler 2-6-0 Mogul had either been retired or renumbered, but probably retired account worn out and set aside. SL&FD 6 was retired by SL&FtD sometime in the 1890s.
4. U&N 16 was sold in November 1887 to Salt Lake & Ft. Douglas 16, later renumbered to SL&FtD 3. The sale price was shown as $2,500.
5. U&N 17 was sold in September 1888; believed sold to Salt Lake & Ft Douglas 17, renumbered to SL&FtD 2 by November 15, 1888; the U&N journal entry shows the sale price as $2,000.

A journal entry in September 1888 showed U&N 17 with a value of $6600, with $2000 having been received from its sale, leaving the amount of $4600 to be written off. Unfortunately, since the purpose of this entry is for charging to the 'Equipment Suspense' account the difference between book value and amount of cash received, no mention of the purchaser was necessary. However, elsewhere research found an exchange of telegrams in mid-September of 1888, in which the Salt Lake & Ft. Douglas RR quite insistently demands that "our engine No. 17" (then in use on the Utah & Nevada line) be turned over to them (i.e., the SL&FtD), which apparently was done, as it, the No. 17, appears in a report of the condition of SL&FtD motive power dated September 17, 1888.

The same September 1888 journal entry showed that U&N Nos. 24 and 25 were most likely also purchased by SL&FtD. This conclusion comes from the fact that they are in the same journal entry, at a price John W. Young is known to have paid for some of his locomotives. Also, there has to be at least four of these Baldwin Moguls going to the SL&FtD, and there are simply none others available. John W. Young himself states he bought 'half-a-dozen' of them, but actually just five.

Numbering of these three engines on the SL&FtD is not a matter of absolute certainty, but it appears that, from numerous reports of work being done on the engines, and similar incidental mentionings of engine numbers, the 24 and 25 became SL&FtD 8 and 9 (but which to which is unknown), and the 17 eventually became SL&FtD No. 2. A photo of what is clearly an ex-U&N Baldwin Mogul, taken by Crockwell at Park City in mid-1891, shows on the sandbox the number 8, but is at such an angle that the builder's plate is indecipherable.
6. U&N 18 was sold in June 1887 to Coeur d'Alene Ry & Nav. Co No. 3; the U&N journal entry shows the sale price as $4,500.

U&N No. 18 was the first locomotive sold, in apparent anticipation of the surplus of narrow gauge motive power to be brought about by the widening of the most important (and busiest) part of the Utah & Northern line in July of 1887; this engine also was the highest-priced sale, being some $1,000 more than the next highest sale price.

After about a half-dozen years on the Coeur d'Alene Ry & Nav Co, this engine was sold in February 1893 to a dealer in Philadelphia, James Richardson, who in turn sold it to the Houston, East & West Texas Ry (as No. 18?), after which it was owned by a variety of lumber companies, and was one of the first locomotives to pass through the hands of the Southern Iron & Equipment Co., in 1903 (see Colorado Rail Annual, No. 15, page 68).
7. U&N 19 was sold in June 1888 to Ilwaco Steam Nav. Co. (later Ilwaco Ry & Nav. Co.) No. 1; the U&N journal entry shows the sale price as $2,500); scrapped in about 1911.
8. U&N 21 (ex U&N 17 before 1885) should not be confused with the later OSL&UN 21. U&N 21 was one of the above mentioned 19 locomotives dropped from equipment before January 1891.

U&N 22 (ex U&N 18 before 1885) became Utah & Nevada 5, probably in April 1889. U&N No. 22 is one of five engines shown in the roster of June 1, 1889 as having been sold in the previous year (i.e., since June 1, 1888), and is probably the engine referred to in an item in the Salt Lake Tribune of April 30, 1889, noting the receipt by the Utah & Nevada of a 20-ton Baldwin 'passenger' engine from the Utah & Northern the night before (the other four 'sold' in the year ended June 1, 1889 are known sales).

U&N 22, which may have briefly been numbered 5 on the Utah & Nevada, appears to have become OSL&UN 21, instead of reverting to its previous pre-1885 number, as apparently was the case with No. 11 (Note 2, above).

In March of 1897, OSL&UN 21 became OSL 1, one of the three (3) old Utah & Northern engines to pass to the OSL. It is retired, account worn out, in May of 1902, and presumed scrapped, since it is not known to have been sold with the other three OSL engines to the Sumpter Valley Ry. in April 1903.
9. U&N 23 was sold February 1888 to Portland & Willamette Valley Ry No. 1; the U&N journal entry shows the sale price as $3,000.

After its relatively brief use as Portland & Willamette Valley No. 1, the old No. 23 sat idle for several years before being sold in 1906 to the Ilwaco Railway & Navigation Co., as their No. 4, later N-2 and finally 2. It was the last locomotive in service on the Ilwaco line, and was scrapped in April 1931, the boiler going to Astoria, Oregon.
10. U&N 24 and 25 were sold in September 1888; believed to Salt Lake & Ft Douglas 8 and 9 (sequence unknown).

A journal entry in September 1888 showed that U&N Nos. 24 and 25 were most likely also purchased (along with U&N 17) by SL&FtD, for the same $2,000 sale price. This conclusion comes from the fact that U&N 17, 24, and 25 are in the same journal entry, at a price John W. Young is known to have paid for some of his locomotives. Also, there has to be at least four of these Baldwin Moguls going to the SL&FtD, and there are simply none others available. John W. Young himself states he bought 'half-a-dozen' of them, but actually just five.

Numbering of these three engines on the SL&FtD is not a matter of absolute certainty, but it appears that, from numerous reports of work being done on the engines, and similar incidental mentionings of engine numbers, the 24 and 25 became SL&FtD 8 and 9 (but which to which is unknown), and the 17 eventually became SL&FtD No. 2. A photo of what is clearly an ex-U&N Baldwin Mogul, taken by Crockwell at Park City in mid-1891, shows on the sandbox the number 8, but is at such an angle that the builder's plate is indecipherable.
11. U&N 80 was sold in September 1889 to Oregon Improvement Co., as Colombia & Puget Sound Railroad 2nd No. 3; the U&N journal entry shows the sale price as $2,500.

U&N 94 was sold in November 1889 to Oregon Improvement Co., as Columbia & Puget Sound RR 2nd No. 4; the U&N journal entry shows the sale price as $2,400.

U&N 80 and 94, first of the Brooks Moguls to be sold off (all 21, Nos. 80-100, were still on the roster at June 1, 1889), went to the Oregon Improvement Company in September and November 1889, respectively, to become Columbia & Puget Sound Railroad 2nd No. 3 and 2nd No. 4, respectively. After their C&PS service, both of these engines were sold in 1898, becoming White Pass & Yukon Route Nos. 1 and 2 (but which became which is not entirely certain), and in 1899 were renumbered 51 and 52. Both were rebuilt extensively in 1900, with larger boilers and so forth, and, amazingly, both still exist, in varying states of decay, more or less on display, one at Skaguay, the other up the line somewhere (info at hand does not say where), but the 1900 rebuilding so largely altered their appearance that they do not much resemble the U&N Brooks Moguls except for being the same wheel arrangement.
12. U&N 83 was declared vacant on December 31, 1891; scrapped prior to January 1, 1891 (UP accounting journal entry, dated December 31, 1891; book value of $7310 struck from accounts)
13. U&N 84 was noted still in service in April 1891 (Salt Lake Tribune, April 2, 1891); no journal entry found for disposition, gone by December 31, 1892.

U&N 88 was on hand on December 31, 1890, no journal entry found for disposition, gone by December 31, 1892. (Pitchard says possibly to Sumpter Valley Ry. as their No. 3, in about January 1892; Tufford disagrees.)

U&N 96 was noted still in service, per Salt Lake Tribune, August 19, 1891; no journal entry found for disposition, gone by December 31, 1892.

U&N 99 was on hand on December 31, 1890, no journal entry found for disposition, gone by December 31, 1892.

There are four (4) of the Brooks Moguls for which no reliable disposition data have as yet been found; they are Nos. 84, 88, 96 and 99. Of this lot, it can be determined that one was dropped from equipment in 1891, and the other three dropped in 1892. Information at hand does not admit of a determination any more exact than that. (Possible disposition from Pitchard: Of this four, however, one goes to the Sumpter Valley Railway, almost certainly as that road's No. 3, around about January 1892. Another of these four engines may possibly be the origin of the Brooks Mogul on the Dolly Varden Mines operation, up in British Columbia. The two remaining were probably scrapped by OSL&UN.)
14. U&N 86 was declared vacant December 31, 1891 (at $6,700) (Pitchard says possibly to Sumpter Valley Ry. as their No. 1, in about April 1891; Tufford disagrees.)

U&N 97 was declared vacant December 31, 1891 (at $6,700) (Pitchard says possibly to Sumpter Valley Ry. as their No. 2, in about April 1891; Tufford disagrees.)

U&N 86 and 97 were two of the six 2-6-0 Moguls vacated by the OSL&UN in 1891. (Possible disposition from Pitchard: Based upon the nature of the entry vacating Nos. 86 and 97, the nature of the deal between the U.P. and the Oregon Lumber Company that created the Sumpter Valley Railway, and the lack of any other rationally viable options, that these two locomotives, Nos. 86 and 97, became Sumpter Valley Ry. Nos. 1 and 2, respectively, at some time in the period from April through July, 1891.)
15. U&N 91 became OSL&UN (?); to OSL 3 in March 1897 (Pitchard says possibly to Sumpter Valley Ry. as their No. 12, in April 1903; Tufford disagrees.)
16. U&N 101 was transferred in May 1886 to Denver, South Park & Pacific No. 101, to replace DSP&P Mason "Bogie" No. 50, destroyed in wreck on U&N on May 12, 1886; to DL&G No. 101, in 1889; dropped from equipment on December 31, 1891, presumed scrapped.
17. U&N 260-265 were renumbered to OSL&UN 260-265 in August 1889; the entire class was sold in July 1890 to Denver, Leadville & Gunnison Ry. 260-265; in January 1899 reorganization of UP's colorado roads as the Colorado & Southern Ry., they became C&S Nos. 57-62. C&S No. 60 (formerly U&N 263) donated to Idaho Springs, Colo., for display in 1941 (and still there), the others having been scrapped, in the 1923-1938 period. Single locomotive dispositions as follows:
U&N 260 to DL&G 260 in 1890; to C&S 57 in 1899; scrapped March 1923.
U&N 261 to DL&G 261 in 1890; to C&S 58 in 1899; scrapped December 1938.
U&N 262 to DL&G 262 in 1890; to C&S 59 in 1899; scrapped April 1925.
U&N 263 to DL&G 263 in 1890; to C&S 60 in 1899; to display at Idaho Springs, 1941.
U&N 264 to DL&G 264 in 1890; to C&S 61 in 1899; scrapped January 1930.
U&N 265 to DL&G 265 in 1890; to C&S 62 in 1899; scrapped December 1927.
18. U&N 285 and 286 were retired by March 1886. (Union Pacific Employees' Magazine, Vol. 1, 1886, April 1886, page 94; letter from "N.E.B." dated March 23, 1886 noting that "Engines No.'s 285 and 286 have been condemned.")

U&N 285 (ex U&N 4, UN 4 "Logan"). The photograph on the cover of Ehernberger's 1989 reprint of UP's June 1, 1885 listing of "Locomotives, Snow Plows, Flangers and Passenger and Freight Car Equipment" shows U&N 285 at Garrison, Montana. It was quite clearly a switcher, having a footboard 'pilot' fore and aft, as also a headlamp in the usual place in addition one on the rear of the tender tank. Most interesting is that the engine still has its original cab, and the name 'LOGAN' is quite readable indeed, as is the 'Utah & Northern' just under said name; and the immense '285' on the tender could be seen.

Allen Copeland's December 1964 U&N roster shows U&N going to Sumpter Valley number 285.
19. U&N 297 (ex U&N 3, UN 3 "Idaho"), was dropped from equipment by 1886; although assigned a number in 1885, the UP 1885 annual report did not include U&N 297 in its listing of 10-Wheel locomotives (just two were shown: U&N 285 and 286); by 1885/1886 number 297 was probably already in use as a stationary boiler in the Eagle Rock shops (see Salt Lake Herald, 5 Nov 1885).

***

Creative Commons License Valid XHTML 1.0 Strict Valid CSS!